"Hey Scott, I had a quick question for you and the blogsters. I recentlysubscribed to WWE 24/7 and I was wondering how things were added onthere. For example, this month it says "WEEK 1" spans from 8/28 to 9/3.I was wondering if everything was added on 8/28, or if it was addedbetween the two dates. I was also wondering what versions of thingswere being shown, for instance, SummerSlam 1996 is on there right now,would that be the live ppv version or the commercial releaseversion...Also while Im writing this, I was wondering if I could get afree copy of your newest book, since I've been a supporter of yours,spanning all the way back to the rantsylvania days and I have your 3other books. Hey...you cant blame a guy for trying right? Thanks Scott" Ho ho, pretty sneaky at the end there. I do have a whole bunch of copies and I'll probably do some sort of contest once my friends and relatives have siphoned all the books they need off me, but that probably won't ...

"Hey Scott, This is Matt Foster, fos4545 from the blog.  Sorry I haven't been at the blog for a while, I just got married and started a new school year at a new school and the kids are kicking my ass right now. Anyway, I have a question/statement/musing: With all of this McMahoning going around on RAW and the DVD, it seems like the pinnacle of Vince being all over TV.  Raw just doesn't seem motivated, the characters are bland, and the writing is at best boring, and at worst offensive. My question is, what if this isn't Vince's fault?  I think the Attitude Era worked because Vince was tempered by creative, extroverted personalities like Austin, Rocky, Foley, HBK, the Undertaker, and the rest.  Even HHH was a thousand times more entertaining when he was getting over as the best wrestler in the world.  It was entertaining because each guy was in to their gimmick and running with it full force.  Now the only people that seem to do that on Raw are Edge, Umaga, and Vince...