Scott, hope all is well. Thought I'd give you a break from the Bryan/HHH stuff...
I don't think I've EVER seen you give your opinion on the streak...
Should it be ended?
If so, would you end it in Takers last match, end it to put over the heir apparent (guy like Reigns), or end it to set up a huge rubber match (like have Cena/Taker split the first two and then build to a rubber match in Takers final WM match)?
Or would you keep it in tact for whatever value is in that?
The value in the streak is chasing it, not actually ending it for whatever theoretical rub that Undertaker might give a guy, since they'd just fuck it up anyway and have someone else beat the Streak-Killer so as to try and get everyone over and thus get no one over. Plus once you've taken that genie out of the bottle, you can't just build up another 20 year run of some guy, so why even take the chance? On a related note...
I must have missed this somewhere, but could you please explain why UT-Cena is so desired for WM? I mean, we assume UT goes over because Streak, but then why do we want Cena not to go over at WM? I mean, yeah, suspense booking and all, and Cena doesn't NEED to go over, but what's the point?
It's desired because it's one of the last big matches we've never seen on that level, and one of the last ones where the result would be in doubt enough for people to suspend their disbelief. Plus it would be a great fucking match and one I would pay money to see.