Skip to main content

PWI audio ripping on you


In Dave and Mike's inane podcast today, they spend the last 20 minutes or so ripping on you and Bayless. I can provide it to you and Bayless later if you care to listen to it. I'm a bit restricted here at work. They do mention a bloody decapitation for Bayless and don't treat your Netcop name very kindly. Mike also reads about a chapter from Bill DeMott's book so I don't know how they can be bitching about Fair Use.

ts14 on the forums. 


I'm glad Dave is stepping up his game because this feud has been a flop so far.  I've got a kid with a broken leg!  Medical bills cost money!  Well, not in Canada, but for some people.  

Comments

  1. This proves that you and BB are the guys that draw money...Scherer is the guy who works with the guy who draws money.

    We clown on him and laugh. He gets all supercereal and let's it affect his...ahem...work.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Subscription to PWInisder 69.99
    Broadband internet service 39.99
    Knowing Dave Scherer can't stop fuming and obsessing over you.....priceless

    ReplyDelete
  3. Mister_E_PuttingPedalsToMedalsJune 26, 2014 at 5:41 PM

    I don't really think that there's a feud to be had. Dave was a douche, we had a bit of fun at his expense, and now it should be more or less over other than an occasional call back to that poor dog.


    Dave is going to continue being a douche. Even the combined might of the BOD does not have the power to stop that.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Wouldn't it be affecting Scott and Brian's work as well since atleast Scott gets paid off of this and he's mentioned it a few times as well.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Tell me there is a lawyer on this board that can work up some legal statement threatening them for defamation on their podcast?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Mister_E_PuttingPedalsToMedalsJune 26, 2014 at 5:43 PM

    I asked Dave if he'd refer me to his fake lawyer, but nothing yet.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Man, Scherer keeps showing what a total dick he is. I wish he'd lose a bunch of subscribers over this shit.

    ReplyDelete
  8. None of us is paying Scott directly to be here. You're a subscriber, and you listen in to hear about 20 minutes of a dumb ass twitter war? That'll put butts in the seats.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Wait a minute. Is a subscription to PWI really 70 fucking bucks? Who the hell would pay that?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Defamation of Character. Someone should consult an ACTUAL lawyer.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Uncrusimatic_Buck_NastyJune 26, 2014 at 5:47 PM

    that poor dog

    ReplyDelete
  12. For wrestling news? Fuck that shit. I've never paid for my wrestling news.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I bought Torch for a couple years but this was the pre podcast era and I really liked their board and their audio content..and was a single dude with cash to waste.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Uncrusimatic_Buck_NastyJune 26, 2014 at 5:48 PM

    let me guess, the premium podcast is behind the paywall

    and the only way to listen to it is to have bayless post it

    i think that's how it works with the pay stuff

    ReplyDelete
  15. Sweet Lee, Esq. at your service.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Not to mention releasing Bayless' real name, which could jeopardize his job. There must be some kind of legal ramifications from that.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Mister_E_PuttingPedalsToMedalsJune 26, 2014 at 5:49 PM

    In fairness, a sizable number of us did imply, or outright state, that he has tender relations with his dog. I don't think anyone has any high ground to pull on defamation.

    ReplyDelete
  18. No doubt. If there was time for an actual lawsuit now would be the time

    ReplyDelete
  19. I never heard of youJune 26, 2014 at 5:49 PM

    People who pay for wrestling news in the age of the internet are retarded. That is all.

    ReplyDelete
  20. My clearly slanderous attacks are copyrighted, foo!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Bayless should really send Scherer a bill for all the bandwidth he saved

    ReplyDelete
  22. Uncrusimatic_Buck_NastyJune 26, 2014 at 5:51 PM

    but we're faceless usernames

    ReplyDelete
  23. Mister_E_PuttingPedalsToMedalsJune 26, 2014 at 5:52 PM

    I just noticed the hands in your clouds.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Someone compared it to paying for porn, which is a great comparison.

    ReplyDelete
  25. To think I was going to be the bigger man and post an apology to "stealing" from PWI just to end this silly bullshit

    ReplyDelete
  26. Wait a minute. *I* am that retard.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Is the podcast behind the paywall?

    ReplyDelete
  28. Ice feuds....brings me back to the early 2000's. Had 'em every week

    ReplyDelete
  29. I honestly think you should seek legal action just for the fact that he publicly published your real name. That's some kind of risk to job security or something.

    ReplyDelete
  30. I never heard of youJune 26, 2014 at 5:53 PM

    In the age of being able to type anything into google and get hundreds of news results, how can anything in journalism be considered stealing at this point?

    ReplyDelete
  31. This guy is classless Brian, I wouldn't even stress it.

    ReplyDelete
  32. And I communicated today with Scherer via email just to clear the air and end this and he decides to attack me some more

    ReplyDelete
  33. That was me and yeah thats exactly what it is. Who the fuck pays for wrestling news pretty much ever. I've been coming on the internet since 96 and I've never had a loss of wrestling news for free. That being said I know there are many proud subscribers to the Observer on here.

    ReplyDelete
  34. How could releasing his name jeopardize his job? Is his job checking Dave's twitter account? I'm confused.

    ReplyDelete
  35. I never heard of youJune 26, 2014 at 5:56 PM

    I've never paid for news of any kind since the internet went mainstream in the 90's. Those sites that set up paywalls are kidding themselves. I'll just go to one of the other 5 million news sites for coverage on the same topic thanks.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Because he can get some money and mileage.out of feuding with you and SK.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Uncrusimatic_Buck_NastyJune 26, 2014 at 5:56 PM

    bwahah

    i roginally used that when i thought i was just going to be everyone'e fav asshole, but i'm not really an asshole.

    so i took ddp's advice and decided to crank my real self up to 1000, and thus was born everyone's fav loser

    but i think the picture is actually nice, spread butthole aside, so i kept it

    ReplyDelete
  38. Any chance he tapes the podcast ahead of time? (yeah, probably not)

    ReplyDelete
  39. He said he works in hospitals and would prefer to remain anonymous on the internet for his clients' sake. Which I can totally understand.

    ReplyDelete
  40. He's far too busy maintaining is two homes.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Exactly. He's doing it for page views and nothing more

    ReplyDelete
  42. Uncrusimatic_Buck_NastyJune 26, 2014 at 5:57 PM

    welp, you know what to do

    e-mail all of us

    ReplyDelete
  43. Probably but still, he attacks me after he bans me from his site. Its easier that way for him

    ReplyDelete
  44. This is similar to a fading Yujiro picking a fight with Ishii.

    ReplyDelete
  45. I say we all just no sell the shit out of it and move on, lest we give him the money.for home number 3.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Uncrusimatic_Buck_NastyJune 26, 2014 at 5:58 PM

    whoever has the podcast should get it to us, just on principle

    ReplyDelete
  47. I never heard of youJune 26, 2014 at 5:58 PM

    This feud needs a Horseman run in...

    ReplyDelete
  48. Again though Scott posting it here and everyone commenting in theory puts butts in his seats. Its stupid on both ends but lets not pretend that Scott isn't above all of this by reposting non sense that he could easily ignore. This is the stupidest thing I've ever seen on this board. Its embarrassing how punch drunk everyone is over this. It feels like a 1997 internet wrestling site war its insane that 30 and 40 year old men are arguing over what other 30 and 40 year old men said about someone reporting on pro wrestling. Everyone form Dave, to Scott to even slightly Bayless and especially all of the people on the fringe. They should really take a step back and just try and forget they were ever involved with this.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Yup, ditto. I'd love to see what this asshole said.

    ReplyDelete
  50. We are all bored, and having fun with a ridiculous situation.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Mister_E_PuttingPedalsToMedalsJune 26, 2014 at 6:00 PM

    "but i think the picture is actually nice, spread butthole aside, so i kept it"


    This sort of comment is why the internet is awesome. No one who grew up with print has ever read that combination of words before.

    ReplyDelete
  52. I am highly amused by the "not in Canada" comment and wish to apply it to many things in life.

    Suggestions?

    ReplyDelete
  53. This is like YOSHI-HASHI trying to fight Ishii.

    ReplyDelete
  54. I pay for (some of my) porn, but then again I watch a lot of it, and feel like I owe it to the workers. But wrestling news? Ehh, no.

    ReplyDelete
  55. People are so fucking rude. Well, not in Canada, but other places.

    ReplyDelete
  56. "I can get terrible, watered down beer in the U.S....but not in Canada." Oh, TAG!

    ReplyDelete
  57. I never heard of youJune 26, 2014 at 6:02 PM

    I had never heard of Dave Scherer before today.

    ReplyDelete
  58. "You know, I'm so glad to have my teeth not be knocked out by a hockey puck. I'm sure most feel the same way."


    "...not in Canada."

    ReplyDelete
  59. This feud screams Bayless inexplicably switching sides. And then only gives us a "You don't deserve a reason!"

    ReplyDelete
  60. Contact Anonymous. I'm sure they'd help out. They hate douchebag fat cats.

    ReplyDelete
  61. Me too. Why bother? Let's just take the running jokes we have and use them forever in a different context.

    "Ziggler just got pinned by Hornswaggle!"

    "That poor fucking dog."

    ReplyDelete
  62. But what about the dog?
    What about the dog?!
    What about the DOG?!
    He saw it all.

    "You didn't see it.
    You didn't hear it.
    You won't say nothing to nobody,
    NEVER IN YOUR LIFE!"

    ReplyDelete
  63. I've paid no attention to him since...oh, 2001. I'm sure it won't be hard.

    ReplyDelete
  64. TBH, there's only one Dave & Mike show that's worth a shit anyways..

    ReplyDelete
  65. I never heard of youJune 26, 2014 at 6:04 PM

    "The Road Warriors are attacking Sting!!!!"

    ReplyDelete
  66. This feud needs an enema.


    Oh, no. Wait. I was channeling Nicholson's Joker for unknown reasons.

    I meant that this feud needs some actual violence.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Wait'll they get a load of me...

    Oop.

    Oop.

    AAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

    ReplyDelete
  68. "It doesn't matter what the reason is!"

    ReplyDelete
  69. Uncrusimatic_Buck_NastyJune 26, 2014 at 6:05 PM

    for whoever heard the podcast, did scherer actually explain who scott and brian are, or did he just launch into his diatribe as if everyone already was up to speed?

    i was reckon the latter, since his biggest audience are people who are him

    ReplyDelete
  70. Why not both? A violent enema!


    Come to think of it, I think I saw a porn once called Violent Enema.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Did you SEE the picture with the dog? It's wasn't a huge leap.

    ReplyDelete
  72. Uncrusimatic_Buck_NastyJune 26, 2014 at 6:06 PM

    have you ever danced with the devil in the pale moonlight?

    no? what about pooched your pooch?

    ReplyDelete
  73. I can concede to this. If this sillyness is due to boredom hopefully Daniel Bryan is released or Dolph Ziggler wins the title or TNA's Impact beats RAW in the ratings or something so that this place can get back to normal!

    ReplyDelete
  74. A better question is whether he mentioned the BoD's fun from last night at all.

    ReplyDelete
  75. This all needs to be settle in WARGAMES! THE MATCH BEYOND.

    ReplyDelete
  76. Mocking the meltdown of the week is the new normal.

    ReplyDelete
  77. NEXT WEEK ON BOD RAW:

    We visit the Paywall Insider war room! Watch the zany adventures of Dozenaire Dave as he's joined by Muck Johnson and the Nacho Dog!

    ReplyDelete
  78. Uncrusimatic_Buck_NastyJune 26, 2014 at 6:07 PM

    no, he was too busy talking about his fun from last night

    ...that poor dog

    ReplyDelete
  79. Mister_E_PuttingPedalsToMedalsJune 26, 2014 at 6:07 PM

    I did. And it wasn't. And I made the leap myself, I'm not claiming any high ground.

    ReplyDelete
  80. Tell me about it

    ReplyDelete
  81. Screw that noise.


    I'm making this a TAG TEAM MATCH, PLAYA!

    ReplyDelete
  82. Uncrusimatic_Buck_NastyJune 26, 2014 at 6:08 PM

    "that poor dog" is the best meme ever

    ReplyDelete
  83. LOL. Okay, not gonna lie. I legit want to see that now.

    ReplyDelete
  84. "...and the Lord did part the skies, as though it were his butthole, and rain feces in diarrhetic form down upon the sinners and heathens."

    Scripture, ladies and gentlemen.

    Well, ok. Lady.

    ReplyDelete
  85. Concur. It has to be part of BoD lexicon henceforth.

    ReplyDelete
  86. Two Home Tony vs. Muck Junsohn in a GED on a Pole Match!

    ReplyDelete
  87. Uncrusimatic_Buck_NastyJune 26, 2014 at 6:09 PM

    always nice to see someone quoting the jim

    ReplyDelete
  88. So the WWE Network for a year then. Decisions decisions.....

    ReplyDelete
  89. "Oh boy, General Disarray, m-maybe we just oughtta stay outta this one."

    ReplyDelete
  90. I'm trying to find it in the other thread. If someone else has it readily accessible, please post.

    ReplyDelete
  91. Uncrusimatic_Buck_NastyJune 26, 2014 at 6:10 PM

    up with there oh, TAG, money on the table, etc etc

    ReplyDelete
  92. Um. Why would you watch that?


    :: pondering ::


    Never mind. I withdraw the question. But, will still post it. Because you know. Comedy.

    ReplyDelete
  93. Dave's wife in his Facebook photo seems to be a very lovely woman, even though she looks like a bitch.

    ReplyDelete
  94. Can we refer to Scherer as "Little Poochie" from now on?

    ReplyDelete
  95. I never heard of youJune 26, 2014 at 6:11 PM

    Clearly this is all leading to a Caliber Winfield on a Pole match.

    ReplyDelete
  96. YOU WANNA GET NUTS?!

    COME ON!!

    Let's get nuts.

    ReplyDelete
  97. These are the facts...and they are...indisputable.

    ReplyDelete
  98. Hey,hey.I used that picture before you,pay me 500$ or I'll sue you.

    ReplyDelete
  99. Uncrusimatic_Buck_NastyJune 26, 2014 at 6:11 PM

    made me think of the opening bit from eddie murphy raw

    now it's raining!

    ...now it's snowing!

    ...and he kicked him the ding ding!

    ReplyDelete
  100. I always try to be speak facts

    ReplyDelete
  101. wait. Wait. WAIT.

    So...does this mean that I will get few wrestling tidbits on the BoD?


    Damn you, Dave! Damn you straight TO HELL!

    What's that you say? I should pay for your newsletter? Um. Sure. I'll get right on that.

    ReplyDelete
  102. With a run-in by Truck Woodboard and The Tritonfo?

    ReplyDelete
  103. Uncrusimatic_Buck_NastyJune 26, 2014 at 6:13 PM

    used it to what?

    ReplyDelete
  104. Mister_E_PuttingPedalsToMedalsJune 26, 2014 at 6:13 PM

    Exactly, it's been slow. This is what we've got.


    Dave Scherer and his poor dog.

    ReplyDelete
  105. Ewwww you sick fuck

    ReplyDelete
  106. Just watched that again on Netflix a week or two ago.

    ReplyDelete
  107. In my avatar.

    ReplyDelete
  108. I never heard of youJune 26, 2014 at 6:14 PM

    Everybody's just ripping off Meltzer anyways so what's the big deal :P

    ReplyDelete
  109. Instead of reviewing a shoot interview, Brian should review the podcast--with snide comments sprinkled throughout.

    ReplyDelete
  110. Uncrusimatic_Buck_NastyJune 26, 2014 at 6:15 PM

    tell bill to have a coke and smile and shut the fuck!

    yeah, i fucked her! bit i make love to you

    ReplyDelete
  111. I'm not a lawyer but I went to law school. I still can't believe Scherer actually said he has a lawyer looking into this.

    ReplyDelete
  112. Stuie Capicola as the special guest referee

    ReplyDelete
  113. Truth is a defense for slander/libel. Bayless did post information from the Elite site, which violates the ToS. I haven't heard the podcast but don't know if it is anything beyond insults, which aren't usually enough to be libel.

    ReplyDelete
  114. This will of course lead all of us to get malware from pwinisder. #useprotection

    ReplyDelete
  115. When you're inside PWInsider, you're inside every snark PWInsider has ever been with #WrapYourDickBeforeYouClick

    ReplyDelete
  116. That poor dog.

    ReplyDelete
  117. 2nd time i'm watching NXT and there's no thread to discuss it. Do they have 46 different commentating teams? Plus who's this fat Rhino looking dude? He looks like he quantum leaped out of a 1994 Raw jobber.

    ReplyDelete
  118. Mister_E_PuttingPedalsToMedalsJune 26, 2014 at 6:19 PM

    I WISH that I could sue anyone who ever called me a dick.

    ReplyDelete
  119. Mister_E_PuttingPedalsToMedalsJune 26, 2014 at 6:20 PM

    I hadn't even been aware of Dave Scherer in like 15 years, give or take.


    This is pretty much the only wrestling site that I go to other than the odd time I use someone else's computer to go to 411.

    ReplyDelete
  120. I never heard of youJune 26, 2014 at 6:21 PM

    public class PWIInsider {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
    while (paying for wrestling news == LAME)
    System.out.println("Scott Keith is the only wrestling news site worth a shit... and it's FREE!")
    }
    }

    ReplyDelete
  121. I can't believe this is the way a 55+ year old man is spending his time.

    ReplyDelete
  122. TASTES LIKE BURNING!

    ReplyDelete
  123. Drop a pipe bomb to breathe some life into this feud!

    "Dave Scherer is going to make money despite himself. He’s got, like, $446 in the bank and should... Well, no, that's about right. Still, you know why he’s not a billionaire? Because he surrounds himself with glad-handed, nonsensical, douchebag yes men, like Mike Johnson, who’s going to tell him everything he wants to hear, and I’d like to think that maybe his newsletter will better after Dave Scherer is dead, but the fact is Triple H isn't gonna let him in for free so he can give the show a positive review. It's not 1996, Dave."

    ReplyDelete
  124. Uncrusimatic_Buck_NastyJune 26, 2014 at 6:24 PM

    " the odd time I use someone else's computer to go to 411."

    lol

    ReplyDelete
  125. Bloody decapation? wtf

    ReplyDelete
  126. I never heard of youJune 26, 2014 at 6:27 PM

    Scott Keith and Brian Bayless vs two people I'd never heard of until today. TUNE INTO NITRO!

    ReplyDelete
  127. 10 PRINT "Scherer screws that dog"
    20 GOTO 10

    ReplyDelete
  128. Zanatude Enterprises Inc.June 26, 2014 at 6:29 PM

    That would compile with many errors. Your Java skills are weak.

    ReplyDelete
  129. Zanatude Enterprises Inc.June 26, 2014 at 6:29 PM

    On the other hand, your Commodore BASIC is flawless.

    ReplyDelete
  130. After all of this, I did cancel my subscription!

    ReplyDelete
  131. Seriously, I can't look at Dave's Facebook photo without laughing hysterically. That dog looks like it's screaming.

    ReplyDelete
  132. I never heard of youJune 26, 2014 at 6:32 PM

    Fixed! Now it'll compile just fine.

    ReplyDelete
  133. Zanatude Enterprises Inc.June 26, 2014 at 6:32 PM

    Have you ever seen a bloodless decapitation?

    ReplyDelete
  134. According to his twitter, the dog did not consent.

    ReplyDelete
  135. IT SMELLS LIKE DEAD BUNNIES!

    ReplyDelete
  136. As opposed to the super common non bloody one, I guess.

    ReplyDelete
  137. Fiery sword that cauterizes the wound?

    ReplyDelete
  138. On the inside Mar. Snuggles is screaming on the inside.

    ReplyDelete
  139. So this is what it's come to, eh? A feud between IWC reporters/reviewers?

    What, was the cast of "Battle Dome" busy?

    ReplyDelete
  140. Zanatude Enterprises Inc.June 26, 2014 at 6:39 PM

    Nope.

    * LAME cannot be resolved to a variable.
    * Syntax error, insert ";" to complete Statement.

    You need to do this:

    public class PWIInsider {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
    String PayingForWrestlingNews="LAME";
    while (PayingForWrestlingNews.equals("LAME"))
    System.out.println("BoD is the only wrestling news site worth a shit... and it's FREE!");
    }
    }

    ReplyDelete
  141. It looks so sad.

    ReplyDelete
  142. I never heard of youJune 26, 2014 at 6:41 PM

    It compiled in JGrasp just fine. Don't know what compiler you're using...

    ReplyDelete
  143. Welcome to the BoD!

    ReplyDelete
  144. Zanatude Enterprises Inc.June 26, 2014 at 6:42 PM

    Using Eclipse

    ReplyDelete
  145. Where can I find said podcast?

    ReplyDelete
  146. As long as he's away from that dog, the better.

    ReplyDelete
  147. I never heard of youJune 26, 2014 at 6:43 PM

    Try jGRASP and see. Usually you only need the equals operator if you're comparing two different string variables to each other.

    ReplyDelete
  148. Unsurprisingly, it's behind Scherer's paywall, along with the rest of his VALUABLE CONTENT.

    ReplyDelete
  149. NERD FIGHT!!!

    ReplyDelete
  150. I want to see Dave vs Caliber in real life, I'd be rooting for Caliber.

    ReplyDelete
  151. I never heard of youJune 26, 2014 at 6:45 PM

    Which of us is gonna Spin the Wheel to Make the Deal?

    ReplyDelete
  152. Zanatude Enterprises Inc.June 26, 2014 at 6:45 PM

    Completely sealing the arteries without any blood loss? That would be one hell of a sword.

    ReplyDelete
  153. I just hope you don't get a Coal Miner's Glove match!

    ReplyDelete
  154. I never heard of youJune 26, 2014 at 6:46 PM

    That might be the only way to get Caliber over.

    ReplyDelete
  155. We all would be.

    Of course, if MEEKIN isn't guest referee...currency will be left on a flat surface.

    ReplyDelete
  156. I never heard of youJune 26, 2014 at 6:47 PM

    haha, to this day I have no idea what they were thinking... Because WCW I guess...

    ReplyDelete
  157. Caliber may be crazy, but at least he doesn't go out of his way to attack others.

    ReplyDelete
  158. Zanatude Enterprises Inc.June 26, 2014 at 6:48 PM

    You only just now placed "LAME" in quotes.


    PayingForWrestlingNews == LAME would not have worked, because LAME was undefined.


    Eclipse is mandated by our standards, and I certainly wouldn't program in Java for fun. That's what Perl is for!

    ReplyDelete
  159. TM CooltrainerBretJune 26, 2014 at 6:48 PM

    To be fair, Mike Johnson is like that good TNA wrestler that screws his career by never leaving the company.

    ReplyDelete
  160. Oh, I know. He's been there forever.

    Refresh my memory: is Johnson the one with an impossibly thick hillbilly accent?

    ReplyDelete
  161. I never heard of youJune 26, 2014 at 6:49 PM

    Actually I put it in quotes when I wrote fixed :P Disqus isn't always quick on the updraw.

    ReplyDelete
  162. Mister_E_PuttingPedalsToMedalsJune 26, 2014 at 6:50 PM

    Beat me to it by 1 second.

    ReplyDelete
  163. Stranger in the AlpsJune 26, 2014 at 6:53 PM

    What's going to happen first? Dave Scherer creates a Disqus account and trolls the BoD, or Kim Jong Un watching Seth Rogen's movie and launching all his dud missiles into the Pacific Ocean?


    Because both would be hilarious.

    ReplyDelete
  164. Zanatude Enterprises Inc.June 26, 2014 at 6:54 PM

    Says the guy who writes in 1970's computer code?

    ReplyDelete
  165. I enjoyed Funny People, and I hope that someone creates a Scherer account.

    ReplyDelete
  166. Off topic, but is there going to be a TNA thread?

    ReplyDelete
  167. I never heard of youJune 26, 2014 at 7:00 PM

    Let me just ask the question that everybody REALLY wants to know the answer to: when is CM Punk coming back?

    ReplyDelete
  168. If anything he is going to get more traffic because of all the discussion here and twitter

    ReplyDelete
  169. This is ridiculous. At first I thought it was Meltzer going after Bayless but it was the non-union Mexican equivalent.

    You're one of the good ones, Bayless. Keep it up.

    ReplyDelete
  170. IWC personalities feuding. Did I time travel back to 2000?

    ReplyDelete
  171. Be careful, Scott. Scherer has the "people who didn't pay attention and thought they were subscribing to the observer" demographic locked down.

    ReplyDelete
  172. What is the cost for the Observer?

    ReplyDelete
  173. I need two! You - with the dog...yeah you. Aaaaand....Psychosis. You too. Back of the truck!

    ReplyDelete
  174. If Solomon Crow ever gets called up from NXT, i feel like this is how all of his feuds should start.

    ReplyDelete
  175. TM CooltrainerBretJune 26, 2014 at 7:12 PM

    Yes, but his Terms of Servce might be illegal because the service he provides is illegal. Unlike Bayless, who sources and makes no money off of it, Scherer doesn't source people, plagiarizes their material, and then sells it.

    ReplyDelete
  176. Where's Scotsman and Fritz Capp when you need them.

    ReplyDelete
  177. I think that's buck Woodward, who left a few years ago

    ReplyDelete
  178. Scott Keith and Bayless vs Dave and Mike-- Halloween Havoc "Settling the Score 2" Thunderdome match. Book it!

    ReplyDelete
  179. Or BOD vs PWInsider War Games match, book that. Hell do it for BOD Raw or the other idea I posted earlier.

    ReplyDelete
  180. So this all ends with caliber writing for pw insider right?

    ReplyDelete
  181. Not one second before he gets to headline WrestleMania and get his win back from Brock Lesnar.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment