Skip to main content

September Classics: The Undertaker vs. Shawn Michaels - Ground Zero 9/7/97

This match received top billing over a WWF Championship match. The first major meeting between two of the top stars of all time. The match may end in a schmozz, but how they got there is the story. This would set up the first-ever Hell in a Cell match the next month. The video is in two parts, so click the Read More link to get the second half.




THE UNDERTAKER VS SHAWN MICHAELS [P1] by ivan2007martinez




THE UNDERTAKER VS SHAWN MICHAELS [P2] by ivan2007martinez

Comments

  1. I love how Taker/Brock had a PPV main event in September 2002 that ended in a DQ, to set up a HITC rematch, and there was an outrage that Taker buried Brock by not jobbing to him in the first match.

    This video is an example that this kind of thing happens all the time.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It's just the general disappointment of not getting the payoff right there. Sure, it COULD be for an even better payoff (see Bryan, Daniel) but sometimes you invest three hours into something and want to have awesome things happen while you're actually watching.

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's crazy. I love this match quite a bit, but my favorite part of the entire spiel is the post-match shenanigans. Taker's crazy no-hands plancha still remains one of the all-time wrestling memories that's stuck in my brain forever.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This match is so fucking good. It's so anarchic and even the fuck finish didn't piss me off. I wish we'd get stuff like this main eventing B PPVs these days.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Brock and Shawn Michaels occupied very different roles on the card and are very different types of wrestlers. Shawn not going over Undertaker clean makes less sense than the up and coming monster who destroys everyone.


    After Rock and Hogan did clean jobs it was fair to expect the same from Taker.

    ReplyDelete
  6. And he did it clean as a sheet in the Cell the next month, in a blood bath. Clearly still not good enough apparently!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Ground Zero was an underrated PPV. Obviously this match rules. But the Bret/Patriot match is pretty solid too. And the segment where Austin and Dude forfeit the tag belts and then Austin stuns J.R. is as essential an Austin moment as any.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Why couldn't he job to him twice?

    ReplyDelete
  9. The storyline progression should have been to beat Undertaker and move on to the next opponent. Undertaker was not really high up on the card at this point and was really a step down in terms of who he was feuding with since Undertaker was feuding with Test before.


    He got to beat Hogan in a blood bath the first time, so I don't see why Undertaker is special.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Also famous for being Pillman's last PPV match, sadly.

    ReplyDelete
  11. No, it's a fair question.

    ReplyDelete
  12. It's what should have happened if he was going to wrestle him twice.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Very sad. And even sadder was that interview Vince had with his widow. Worst Raw segment ever besides Katie Vick.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Especially after a really inert PPV. I remember most of that PPV except the Angle/Benoit match being torturous.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Eddie/Edge was very good as well, and the opening 8-man tag was fun. Everything else was pretty bad though, especially the burial of RVD as a top contender.

    ReplyDelete
  16. This match has largely been forgotten, which is understandable given the classics these two would later have. This, however, was an awesome brawl. And Undertaker's plancha was just crazy.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Going over in a bloody cell match > going over in a forgotten title match

    ReplyDelete
  18. Didn't Ambrose/Rollins at MITB pretty much finish like this?

    ReplyDelete
  19. Eh, I took me a while to consider the World Heavyweight Title to be a top title. It had just been introduced earlier that month.

    ReplyDelete
  20. To this day I don't understand what the point of bringing Pillman's widow on RAW supposed to be. Poor woman.

    ReplyDelete
  21. My cynical side says that Vince had a very specific legal agenda; her appearing on the show and saying certain things would absolve the WWF of any responsibility in his death and undercut any potential lawsuits.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Hogan had been promised he would destroy Crock in a rematch, win the title, but then job it back to Brock -- and Bince also didn't want to pay Hogan the overinflated fee to do such nonsense and Hogan claimed back pains and left until Feb.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Still convinced he od'ed on something and the heart attack was a coverup.

    ReplyDelete
  24. One of the great things about this match was the buildup. The commentary was selling the fuck out of this match on Raw as a "first time ever" match. You got the idea this was a big match feel.

    ReplyDelete
  25. On the negative side, Faarooq vs Crush vs Savio (pushed as the WWF's first ever triple threat match, IIRC) is the absolute pits.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment